The real estate industry maybe at a pivotal juncture, with a series of lawsuits challenging the traditional commission structures that have long defined the buying and selling of property. At the heart of these legal battles are allegations that the standard practice of sharing commissions between listing and buying agents not only violates federal antitrust laws but also artificially inflates costs for consumers, hinders competition, and ultimately, disadvantages buyers and sellers alike. These challenges have garnered attention nationwide, with several cases in California leading the charge towards potentially reshaping how real estate transactions are conducted.
Legal Foundations and Allegations
The primary contention in these lawsuits is the assertion that the widely used commission-sharing model violates federal antitrust statutes. Critics of this model contend that it results in increased transaction costs for property sales, limits market competition, and unfairly burdens consumers. Among the most significant legal challenges to this model are the Sitzer/Burnett vs. National Association of Realtors (NAR) and major brokerage firms, and Moehrl vs. NAR, et al. These cases accuse industry leaders of colluding to require home sellers to pay inflated commissions to the buyer's broker, in contravention of antitrust laws.
A landmark verdict in the Sitzer/Burnett case has brought these issues into sharp relief. The jury found that NAR, along with several large real estate firms, had indeed conspired to artificially inflate the commissions paid by home sellers to the buyer's brokers. This groundbreaking decision resulted in a staggering $1.78 billion in damages awarded to the class of approximately 500,000 Missouri homeowners. Given the treble damages provision under antitrust laws, the total fines could exceed $5.3 billion. This verdict not only emphasizes the serious financial repercussions of violating antitrust laws but also marks a pivotal moment for the real estate industry, potentially catalyzing significant changes in how commissions are structured and negotiated.
Directors at NAR have made it clear that they will not lay down and accept this verdict and advise they are in the process of making appeals to have the case thrown out. This development comes amid broader industry shifts, notably why brokerages are leaving NAR, underscoring a period of intense scrutiny and potential transformation within the real estate sector.
Tired of the commission challenges?
View our curated list of 200 Things Real Estate Agents Do For Their Clients including a list top agent Objection Handlers. Get your copy by clicking the image below.
Califonia Commission Lawsuits, Will California be Different?
California's real estate market, known for its consumer-friendly and innovative approaches, might be somewhat shielded from the fallout of these legal proceedings. The state has pioneered practices allowing for the negotiation of buyer's commissions directly, a move towards the transparency and flexibility these lawsuits seek to enforce nationwide. The options provided by C.A.R.'s Residential Purchase Contract facilitate these negotiations and help reduce real estate agents' exposure, in addition to promoting proper disclosure sequencing. Nonetheless, the implications of these legal actions extend far beyond state lines, signaling a potential shift towards different commission structures across the country.
The Latest Legal Challenge
A recent lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in Sacramento by Willsim Latham, LLC., against MetroList Services and several local Realtor associations, alongside major brokerages like RE/MAX, Anywhere, Keller Williams, and eXp World Holdings, underscores the ongoing disputes. This suit alleges collusion to inflate agent commissions and demands significant reforms, including damages and a permanent injunction against the enforcement of "Anticompetitive Broker Rules."
Read more about how California Legistrators may respond.
Implications for the Real Estate Industry
The outcomes of these lawsuits could mean significant changes for the real estate industry, particularly regarding commission negotiations and structures. A shift towards greater transparency and flexibility in these arrangements could enhance competition, potentially driving down costs for consumers and fostering innovation in service provision. However, the industry also faces challenges, such as adapting to a changing legal landscape and addressing potential unintended consequences of altered commission models. One fear many real estate professionals state about the risk of decoupling commissions is reduce dbuyer representation and more cost for buyers, in an already unafforable market.
For more information on lawsuits from a national perspective.
List of California Commission Lawsuit Defendants: As of Feb 15th 2024
National Association of Realtors (NAR)
The Agency Real Estate Franchising
Compass
eXp World Holdings
eXp Realty of California
eXp Realty of Southern California
eXp Realty of Greater Los Angeles
eXp Realty of Northern California
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
BHH Affiliates, LLC
First Team Real Estate – Orange County
Rodeo Realty
Pinnacle Estate Properties, Inc.
California Regional Multiple Listing Service (CRMLS)
Combined L.A./Westside MLS, Inc. (CLAW)
California Association of Realtors (C.A.R.)
Greater Los Angeles Realtors (GLAR)
Arcadia Association of Realtors
Burbank Association of Realtors
Citrus Valley Association of Realtors
Glendale Association of Realtors
Inglewood Board of Realtors
Montebello District Association of Realtors
Palos Verdes Peninsula Association of Realtors
Pasadena-Foothills Association of Realtors
Rancho Southeast Realtors
South Bay Association of Realtors
Southland Regional Association of Realtors
Tri-Counties Association of Realtors
West San Gabriel Valley Realtors
Malibu Association of Realtors, Inc.
Southwest Los Angeles Association of Realtors
Madera Association of Realtors
Fresno Board of Realtors
Merced County Association of Realtors
Mariposa County Board of Realtors
MetroList Services
RE/MAX
Anywhere (formerly Realogy Holdings)
Keller Williams
Century 21 Select Real Estate
As the legal landscape around California's commission lawsuits in real estate continues to change, all stakeholders—ranging from large brokerage firms to independent agents and transaction coordinators—must stay abreast of developments. The industry may need to embrace new models of operation and compensation that prioritize transparency, fairness, and consumer welfare above all. These legal challenges not only question the status quo but also offer an opportunity to reimagine real estate transactions for the betterment of all involved.
Comments