In recent years, property owners have faced significant changes in how they must screen prospective tenants, particularly those receiving government rental subsidies, such as Section 8. These regulations aim to protect low-income renters and ensure equal access to housing, regardless of financial assistance programs. As a result, property owners must adhere to stricter standards when evaluating applications. Here are the key updates and requirements:
Standardized Criteria for Tenant Screening
To comply with fair housing laws, property owners must establish objective and non-discriminatory screening criteria that are applied equally to all applicants. Common criteria include:
Credit score thresholds
Income requirements (e.g., income must be three times the monthly rent)
Rental history (no prior evictions or lease violations)
Criminal background checks (limited to ensure compliance with HUD guidelines and to avoid disproportionately impacting protected classes)
It’s crucial that property owners cannot apply different screening standards based on race, national origin, or any other protected class. For example, property owners cannot set higher income levels for one group of tenants or reject someone solely because they rely on government subsidies like Section 8 vouchers.
First-Come, First-Serve Policies
Many property management companies adopt a first-come, first-serve policy to streamline the rental process and minimize claims of discrimination. This method ensures that applicants are processed in the order their applications are received, which helps to avoid subjective tenant selection.
In this model:
Property managers review applications in the order they are submitted.
Once a qualified tenant is identified, the process for other applicants halts.
This policy helps prevent disparate treatment—where one applicant is treated differently based on race, religion, or another protected characteristic under the Fair Housing Act.
Are you currently using a Transaction Coordinator in your Real Estate Business?
Yes
No
Government Subsidies
1. Government Subsidies Must Be Accepted
California law prohibits property owners from rejecting applicants based on their source of income, including government programs like Section 8 or Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH). Property owners must consider these tenants the same as those paying rent without assistance.
Key Law: Senate Bill 329 (effective 2020) ensures that property owners cannot refuse tenants simply because they use housing vouchers or subsidies.
2. Alternative Means of Assessing Financial Capability
Traditionally, property owners have relied heavily on credit reports to assess the financial reliability of prospective tenants. However, under new laws effective in 2024, property owners can no longer rely solely on credit history when evaluating tenants using rental assistance.
If a tenant receives a subsidy, the property owner must allow the tenant to provide alternative proof of financial capability, such as:
Proof of government benefits (e.g., disability or unemployment payments)
Pay stubs or income verification from employment
Bank statements showing savings or regular deposits
This is particularly important for low-income tenants, who may have lower credit scores but demonstrate financial responsibility in other ways.
3. Limited Exceptions
There are some exceptions where credit history may still be used:
If the tenant does not provide alternative evidence of their ability to pay rent.
If the property owner is verifying employment or landlord references.
Want more information like this sent direclty to your inbox?
Key Takeaways for Real Estate Agents
Real estate agents should educate property owners about these updated screening practices to ensure compliance with fair housing laws and avoid potential legal conflicts. Understanding the legal requirements can also help open the door to a wider pool of tenants, including those using government subsidies. To better understand agent responsiblities, take a look at '5 Things Every Realtor Should Know About Property Management'.
Fair Housing Penalties
Violations of fair housing laws carry serious financial consequences. Here’s an overview of potential fines for discriminatory practices:
First Violation: Up to $21,663 in federal fines; up to $16,000 in state fines.
Second Violation (within 5 years): Up to $53,157 (federal) and $37,500 (state).
Third Violation (within 7 years): Up to $108,315 (federal) and $65,000 (state).
These fines can increase further if the U.S. Department of Justice becomes involved, with penalties reaching up to $150,000 in extreme cases.
It's crucial to ensure compliance with fair housing laws, especially when dealing with subsidized tenants or making tenant selection decisions. Missteps, such as denying a tenant with a service animal, can result in costly fines and legal action
Comments